[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: districts for races set to unassigned - 1-11-14

These are internal GEMS keys, not the ID field you see in the district editor.  Yes, that's a bit lame.  We should be logging the user visible ID, or maybe label or tag.  So in short no its not a problem.
 
Ken
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Tyler Lincks
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 4:05 PM
To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
Subject: RE: districts for races set to unassigned - 1-11-14

Is that a default number?  Can the default Jurisdiction Wide district be numbered 0?  Will this cause problems if races are assigned to the Jurisdiction Wide district numbered 0?
 
Tyler
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 5:52 PM
To: bugtrack@dieboldes.com
Subject: RE: districts for races set to unassigned - 1-11-14

According to the log, they were created that way...
 
06/12/01 07:19:47 User admin: Created Race (23): Id 220, Label SCHOOL BOARD, Type 1, Vote For 1, District 0, VGroup1 0, VGroup2 0.
 
etc etc...
 
District 0 is unassigned.
 
Ken
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Tari Runyan
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 3:42 PM
To: Bugs
Subject: districts for races set to unassigned - 1-11-14

this happened today -  this database was being used for certification and from the log file I can see nowhere nor did I ever change the districts that were assigned to the races -  somehow - please let me know Ken or Tab how the races are suddenly now all unassigned.
Tari
Tari Runyan
Global Election Systems, Inc.
547  W. 91st Ave #301
Thornton Co  80260
303-428-5011 office
303 428-5022 fax
303-520-0710 cell