[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: races squished in ballot layout 1-17-20

thank you - I appreciate it and yes I would have to do the manual stuff on most of the Ca accounts as well as west coast.
Tari
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Clark
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 5:32 PM
Subject: RE: races squished in ballot layout 1-17-20

This has been a feature since GEMS started generating postscript.  Turning it off as an option is probably a reasonable request, but I hate to blow it for everyone.  Which account is this?  Obviously they are making a stink or we wouldn't be having this conversation, but we have run dozens (hundreds?) of elections in California with it working the way it does, so something (or someone) must be new.
 
Tari, we'll send you a 1.17.21 prerelease that doesn't squish if its so critical that you'd actually do it manually if we don't send it.  Use it to re-lay out the ballots, and then go back to the standard release until we get this resolved.
 
Ken
 
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-bugtrack@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Tari Runyan
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 2:32 PM
To: Bugs
Subject: Fw: races squished in ballot layout 1-17-20

Is this being looked at ?  any resolution?  if not it means a whole lot of manual moving races.
Thanks
Tari
----- Original Message -----
To: Bugs
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:16 AM
Subject: races squished in ballot layout 1-17-20

attached is picture of races in 1-17-20  - each race has the same font size for header and text so why does Gems squish it in some and not in others -  we need smooth consistent layout of races