|
I hate to say
anything here, but it doesn't make sense to have the fonts inconsistent
IMHO. The whole rationale for dropping Arial Narrow is to avoid
complications with print shops and AVTS units that can't handle it.
Either the database is contaminated with Arial Narrow or it is not
however. Further, the advantages of Arial Narrow (squeeze more text) apply
equally well to candidates and long race text.
To be absolutely
clear though: I am not saying we should drop Arial Narrow or not. I
have no strong opinion on that. I am just saying dropping it for races but
not candidates doesn't make a lot of sense. Certainly, I can see no
advantage to doing that.
Ken
Okay, I'll leave the default fonts for candidates
and endorsements alone (ie Arial Narrow) and make the default font for Races
and Headers to Arial.
Should I change the default size from 10 point to
14 point while I'm at it.
Note: These defaults can be changed in the 'Race
Options' Dialog.
Whatever the consensus is I will work
with
A complaint. You just heard
it.
This RCR has been outstanding for a
while. I will change the default font from Arial Narrow to plain
Arial if I do not here a complaint about this today.
Can the default font in Gems for all
text (candidates, races, headers, endorsements) be set to Arial and
Bold instead of Arial Narrow - No client I know of uses Arieal
Narrow so we always have to change it .
|