Asking for 
follow-ups on old RCRs is good. 
 In this case 
probably, but its the wrong conclusion.  We have requests that are older 
than this that may never be filled.  This is partly (in this case 
mostly) a resource issue.  As you know, Guy Lancaster, who was responsible 
for AVOS development, is no longer with us. 
Understand 
that it is not always a resource issue though.  One can 
always hire more developers (or sales people).  At some point, the stuff 
they are working on is not worth the cost.  You somehow made it though the 
1999 primary without this feature.  Presumably Guy knew that in 1999, and 
worked on something else instead.  I am going to step out on a limb and 
guess that you could also make it though this primary too. 
Its not the 
best example, and we will make every effort to see that this request is 
filled.  In the case of this request, I suspect it simply fell through 
the cracks.  It was not a company-critical request, and that is about all 
we have been working on for years now.  We are working very hard 
as we speak to get the resources we need to see that these kinds of requests are 
completed in a timely manner. 
 Everything 
that is required is in the posting guidelines.  State 
the deadline, and the nature of the deadline.  In this case, the deadline 
is "For the November 2002 primary" and the nature of the deadline is "they have 
been asking for this for a long time, have lived without it, but sure would like 
it a lot". 
Whether an RCR is completed doesn't really have anything to do with 
whether you submit it as "high".  Everyone thinks their request is a high 
priority, and has every right to.  What we need to know is when 
something needs to be completed, and what will happen if it is not.  We 
will never satisfy everyone's requests, and we're real sorry about that.  
If we can't do something, we'll tell you, but we can't tell when the deadline is 
"the sooner the better".  If it looks like a request with a reasonable 
deadline has fallen through the cracks (like this one), post a follow-up and 
we'll get it back on track, or let you know it isn't going to happen.  
As our 
development group strengthens, we also hope to provide more active feedback on 
what we are working on and the status of various projects. 
Ken 
 |