Re: Placer SOV

["Steve Knecht" <skglobal@earthlink.net>]

I've loaded GEMS 1.18.8 up and run the SOVC report.  At the bottom of this
report it does the absentee and polling sub-totals by race in the manner
that the county wants.

RCR Request:  Could there be a checkbox to include or not include the
precinct detail of the absentee and poll totals.  If they want it great,
otherwise, just include the sub-totals - totals at the bottom of the report.

 I think we really are close to giving them what they are looking for here,
and appreciate that alot of work has been done to get it this far.  The
prior email tif file gives a pretty fair idea of the formats customers are
used to.    Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Knecht <skglobal@earthlink.net>
To: Global Support <support@dieboldes.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:56 AM
Subject: Fw: Placer SOV


> I am forwarding this version of the Reports that Placer is used to for the
> SOVC, in the hopes that someone familar with the SOVC can give me the
> checkbox options that most closely approximate this.  Notice the first
page
> Grand Total summary page and the next page absentee summary totals page
> prior to precinct detail. Also, the last line totals after the precincts.
> We have 5 DFM accounts all used to this type of capability.  May we do it
> and I don't know how to tweak it out of the system.  I've loaded GEMS
> Reports 1.17.21 as well as GEMS 1-18-8 (just in case the answer is in that
> branch) and Dmitry has the DB in Vancouver.  Thanks.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Gary Smith <GSmith@placer.ca.gov>
> To: <skglobal@earthlink.net>
> Cc: Ryan Ronco <RRonco@placer.ca.gov>
> Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 11:02 AM
> Subject: Placer SOV
>
>
> Steve:
> On the cards cast report, combing the parties would be ok.  What ever
works
> will be alright.  I guess you got Ryan's message about the SOV.
> Here is some examples of what we like.  If the font could be a little
bigger
> that would be great.
> Gary
>
>
>