[not the subject
change – we have two threads going here, one concerning magnify and one
concerning provisional ballots]
Were they (Georgia) actually sold this? A provisional ballot solution, as I
understand the meaning of the term, is going to require something beefier than
a Spyrus, methinks.
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com
[mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com] On Behalf Of Robert
Pickett
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 3:23 PM
To: rcr@dieboldes.com
Subject: RE: Move Magnify Option
to Voter Control
Using the spyrus, as it
is currently programmed, to create a provisional/challenged voter card at the
precinct level is a stop gap measure that can work in a controlled
demonstration but not in the uncontrolled environment of a
precinct with pollworkers. I have been using an AccuVote Ballot
in the precincts for provisional ballots, however I am getting presure
from the State of Virginia and the City of Norfolk to come up with an electronic solution. What is the time
frame for coming up with a provisional ballot solution that is simple and
easy for the pollworker? The State of Georgia is going to expect an electronic solution not a paper one.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com
[mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Ken
Clark
Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 3:35 PM
To: rcr@dieboldes.com
Subject: RE: Move Magnify Option
to Voter Control
There isn’t any
plan/design in place right now for provisional/challenge ballots beyond what
currently exists. We know this area
needs work. The
provisional/challenge ballot project won’t be (isn’t) related to
the ballot work Ataa is currently working on.
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com
[mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com] On Behalf Of Lesley
Thompson
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 12:06 PM
To: rcr@dieboldes.com
Subject: Re: Move Magnify Option
to Voter Control
Will these ballot station options
also include the option for the PROVISIONAL or CHALLENGE ballot, will they be
with the card encoder module, or something else?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:57 AM
Subject: RE: Move
Magnify Option to Voter Control
Please
note that the archives have been successfully repaired.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com
[mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Ken
Clark
Sent: May 14, 2002 10:52
To: rcr@dieboldes.com
Subject: RE: Move Magnify Option
to Voter Control
See
attached. I can’t seem to
find this email in the archives – apologies if you tried to look this up
first. I have asked Josh to look
into that. Ataa is working on the
infrastructure to support a back button to instructions, language, and
party. Magnify should be
“easy” after that work is complete.
Ken
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com
[mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com] On Behalf Of Steve
Knecht
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 7:13 PM
To: rcr@dieboldes.com
Subject: Move Magnify Option to
Voter Control
Any chance of allowing the Voter the option of the
magnify button (in addition to the pollworker option). Anyone see any big
downside to it? It is a consistent theme I hear from everyone that it
makes sense to allow the voter an option for that as well.
Steve Knecht
Diebold Election Systems
415-893-9941 office 415-893-9951 fax
415-225-6591 cell