| 
 Here are some 
guidelines for submitting test results and bug reports: 
  - Choose a 
  descriptive subject that can be used to track the progress of the bug or 
  feature.  This is the same as for any post to the support or rcr 
  lists.  "GEMS 1.7.4" is not a descriptive subject.  "GEMS 1.7.4 
  testing" is also not a descriptive subject.  We use the subjects to track 
  bugs, features, and operations.
 
  - It is not necessary 
  to submit only one test result in a post;  that would be pedantic.  
  It is necessary that you keep the report to at least one 
  topic.  If you are doing testing on download and you find three problems, 
  post those three problems under the heading "1.7.4 download test 
  results".
 
  - Post test results 
  separately from questions on how GEMS should behave.  If you are unclear 
  on how GEMS should behave while testing, post a separate message to support 
  asking what the correct behavior should be.  If GEMS deviates from the 
  intended behavior, include that in your test results.  Either way 
  contact Rita to clarify the behavior in our documentation.  Never 
  post a given behavior as a bug unless you know it is not intended, since it is 
  very confusing to those reading the report.
 
  - Post test failure 
  conditions separated clearly from success conditions.  Strictly speaking, 
  development is not interested in the success conditions;  we only need to 
  know what went wrong to fix it.  You might want to include in the post 
  your test procedures, including those items that pass, for the interest of 
  other ESG staff that want to reproduce your results.  Just keep them 
  separate.
 
  - Narrow down the 
  cause of the bug to the extent of your ability.  This means eliminating 
  variables that are not relevant to the problem.  As a simple 
  hypothetical example, you might get an "out of sync" error when downloading 
  memory cards.  The database you are using might happen to use Kansas 
  rotation.  Don't include that fact in the report though unless you think 
  it is relevant to the "out of sync" error.  If you are unsure, then 
  re-run the test using no rotation or some other rotation and find 
  out.
  
I will be setting up 
a new mailing list today for discussion and tracking of bugs and testing.  
I will follow up to that list on Nel's results, one topic at a time.  
Everyone on the support list will automatically get subscribed to the bug list, 
so don't worry about missing anything. 
  
Ken 
  
 |