[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: Wyondotte

To: "Donald W. Biszmaier" <dbglobal@earthlink.net>
Subject: RE: Wyondotte
From: "Ken Clark" <ken@gesn.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 14:44:39 -0500
Cc: <support@gesn.com>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <37ED3256.52E9D737@earthlink.net>

Don, please use the support list, as you peers should be able to help you
with GEMS usage questions.

Sub-districts do no overlap geographically so it does not make sense to put
a base precinct into two sub-districts of the same parent district.
"Sub-district at large" is an oxymoron;  those races should be attached to
the parent district.  You can delete the at large sub district.

Ken

> From: Donald W. Biszmaier [mailto:dbglobal@earthlink.net]
> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 1999 3:37 PM
> To: Ken Clark
> Subject: Wyondotte
>
>
> Ken the disstrict involved is Public utilities - they wish to plase
> 11-1, 11-2, 11-3, 11-4a, 11-4b, and 11-6 into the sub district at large
> and sub district 1. Other base precincts without splits occur in the
> parent district, and 2 sub districts.
> Don

Prev by Date: RE: poll book AVTS
Next by Date: AVTS-3-10-6-1
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread