Ken,  I don't 
    understand.  Don says "It is 
    taking approx. 45 sec for a ballot image to be displayed. A small election - 
    1 race - displayed in about 3 sec." How could that be GEMS and OP 
    SCAN?  When does op scan take approx. 45 sec. to 
    display?
 
    -----Original 
      Message-----
From: 
      owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 9:04 
      AM
To: 
      support@dieboldes.com
Subject: RE: 1-18-15 
      bug?
      Don 
      is talking about GEMS and opscan, while your problems in California were 
      with touch screen.  Those are such different code paths on such 
      different hardware that there really isn’t any possibility of the problems 
      being related.
       
      Ken
       
       
      -----Original 
      Message-----
From: 
      owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com] On Behalf Of Steve Knecht
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 8:45 
      PM
To: 
      support@dieboldes.com
Subject: RE: 1-18-15 
      bug?
       
      
      Maybe our 45 
      seconds in CA. in Alameda, Santa Clara, and LA didn't have anything to do 
      with the ballot??  That would be interesting.
 
      
        -----Original 
        Message-----
From: 
        owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Ken Clark
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 
        10:39 AM
To: 
        support@dieboldes.com
Subject: RE: 1-18-15 
        bug?
        Nah, 2 seconds 
        to 45 seconds – something is wrong.  Post the bug and attach the 
        database and someone will look into it.
         
        Ken
         
         
        -----Original 
        Message-----
From: 
        owner-support@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-support@dieboldes.com] 
        On Behalf Of Tari 
        Runyan
Sent: Thursday, 
        January 30, 2003 9:37 AM
To: 
        support@dieboldes.com
Subject: Re: 1-18-15 
        bug?
         
        
        I doubt it is 
        a bug -  18-15 gives you art in languages and the sort time is a 
        little longer.  IMO anyway -  what do the guys up North 
        say?
 
        
        
          
          ----- 
          Original Message ----- 
 
          
          
          
          Sent: 
          Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:24 AM
 
          
          
          
          Has anyone 
          conducted a fairly large size election using 
          1-18-15?
 
          
          PROBLEM - 
          Jeff Co Ky upgraded from 1-17-17 to 1-18-15 hoping to correct modem 
          and audio problems. General 2002 election upgraded to 1-18-15. It is 
          taking approx. 45 sec for a ballot image to be displayed. A small 
          election - 1 race - displayed in about 3 sec.
 
          
              I had 
          them send me the database. Loaded on my laptop in 1-17-15. Ballot 
          image up in 2 sec., upgraded to 1-17-22 with same results. Upgraded to 
          1-18-15 image in 45 sec.. They have 277 ballot styles in this 
          election. Need an answer by 9:00 am monday when they will start to 
          modify master. The db was without audio. db with audio had the same 
          results. It would appear this is a software bug. I will submit to 
          Bugzilla if no one has an answer.
 
          
          
          Donald W. 
          Biszmaier
Support Services Specialist
Diebold Election Systems, 
          Inc.
7717 Greenwood Rd.
Louisville, Ky. 40258
Office 
          502-244-8645
Cell 502-314-6936
Fax 
          502-254-7835