Re: Report Precincts with Base Precincts(ID) Not Correct

To: "Bugtrack@Gesn. Com" <bugtrack@dieboldes.com>

Subject: Re: Report Precincts with Base Precincts(ID) Not Correct

From: "Michael Lai" <mk_lai@dieboldes.com>

Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 15:04:31 -0800

References: <NCBBKBBOCKMACPOAFCEHMEIDCPAA.mike@dieboldes.com>

Going to take this to development.

----- Original Message -----

From: Mike Brown

To: Michael Lai ; Bugtrack@Gesn. Com

Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 2:46 PM

Subject: RE: Report Precincts with Base Precincts(ID) Not Correct

GEMS should handle this.

Mike Brown

1611 Wilmeth Road

McKinney, TX 75069-8250

972.542.6000

800.433.8683

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Lai [mailto:mk_lai@dieboldes.com]
Sent: Friday, February 11, 2000 4:35 PM
To: Bugtrack@Gesn. Com
Subject: Re: Report Precincts with Base Precincts(ID) Not Correct

The reason why Fitzroy is showing up in the "Adv Vote Ward 1" grouping is because the sortseq or the id (in GEMS) of Fitzroy is the same as "Adv Vote Ward 1". They are both 80. The report figures out the grouping by identifying reportunits with the same sortseq. If Fitzroy is changed to a unique sortseq (ie. 100) the report fixes itself.