Ken:
I'd overlooked the Seq. 2 problem. Would a short
term solution be to have the printing company do it?
Don
Ken Clark wrote:
If
a header could be assigned only to the ballot you have on screen it would
solve several problems - such as turn ballot over etc..
Not quite. The common plate
issue is different than this.
What
Minn. wishes to do is have a small header that list each precinct that
the ballot style is good for. Eg. if ballot style 1 will work in precincts
1,2,6,8 & 10 they wish to make a small header with those numbers.
Thanks: Don
It
is more complicated than that. It is not just whether card 1 (you
called it ballot style 1) works in those precincts. It is card 1
sequence 1 that works in those precincts. Card 1 seq 2
might not work in pct 10. So,
even if you drop a card specific header on card 1, this won't work.
You can't get seperate headers for the seq 1 and seq 2 precincts.
They are the same card.Extending
the @precinct macro might work; don't know yet how difficult would
be. There is also the outstanding question of formatting. Do
we do a comma seperated list of precinct ids or the full precinct names?
The "list too big" issue can always be solved by macro expanding to "many
precincts" after some fixed number.Ken
|