[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
RE: Order that Write-ins Appear on AccuVote Tape
I understand, agree, and fully share in your frustrations with the FL
certification "process". I wish I could change the
process, but all I can do is try to make things work with the rules
in place. If I understand correctly that FL's version of 194us.abo is
part of 1.17.17 GEMS and therefore will not change, things will be fine
here.
Mark
At 2/11/2002 07:52 PM, you wrote:
Any
change is an issue to Florida. They'll have to stick with the 1.94us abo that ships with 1.17.whateveritis until they re-certify; there isn't anything to "check with them" about. They don't get to take advantage of any of the other enhancements we make until they re-certify either, but that does not preclude the rest of the country moving forward.
Ken
- -----Original Message-----
- From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Mark S Earley
- Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 6:40 PM
- To: rcr@dieboldes.com
- Subject: RE: Order that Write-ins Appear on AccuVote Tape
- While I like the idea of moving the write-in listing to the end, I am concerned that making the change to the standard 194us.abo might have implications later on in FL, since the current layout is part of the certified package here.
- I can check with the FL Div and get their input if anyone wants to pursue it.
- Mark
- At 2/11/2002 04:51 PM, you wrote:
- With respect to the substance of this request, is there anyone against having this change incorporated into the standard 1.94us abo? We can either create a 1.94usca for Steve's California accounts that puts the write-ins after the candidates, or make that the standard. Either way is equal effort, we just need to know which.
-
- Ken
-
-
-
- From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Steve Knecht
- Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:34 PM
- I am submitting a new RCR for this old RCR. Documentation of prior RCRs below.
-