|
Can you change a filename without recertifying? It
doesn't really matter to me, but if the FL certification is the issue then give
them that filename and add another name that becomes the new standard.
Other than that, does anyone have other concerns about the order of the
write-in?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:15
PM
Subject: RE: Order that Write-ins Appear
on AccuVote Tape
I understand, agree, and fully share in your frustrations with
the FL certification "process". I wish I could change the process, but
all I can do is try to make things work with the rules in place. If I
understand correctly that FL's version of 194us.abo is part of 1.17.17 GEMS
and therefore will not change, things will be fine here.
Mark
At
2/11/2002 07:52 PM, you wrote:
Any
change is an issue to Florida. They'll have to stick with the 1.94us
abo that ships with 1.17.whateveritis until they re-certify; there
isn't anything to "check with them" about. They don't get to take
advantage of any of the other enhancements we make until they re-certify
either, but that does not preclude the rest of the country moving
forward.
Ken
- -----Original Message-----
- From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Mark S
Earley
- Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 6:40 PM
- To: rcr@dieboldes.com
- Subject: RE: Order that Write-ins Appear on AccuVote
Tape
- While I like the idea of moving the write-in listing to the end, I am
concerned that making the change to the standard 194us.abo might have
implications later on in FL, since the current layout is part of the
certified package here.
- I can check with the FL Div and get their input if anyone wants to
pursue it.
- Mark
- At 2/11/2002 04:51 PM, you wrote:
- With respect to the substance of this request, is there anyone
against having this change incorporated into the standard 1.94us
abo? We can either create a 1.94usca for Steve's California
accounts that puts the write-ins after the candidates, or make that the
standard. Either way is equal effort, we just need to know
which.
-
- Ken
-
-
-
- From: owner-rcr@dieboldes.com [mailto:owner-rcr@dieboldes.com]On Behalf Of Steve Knecht
- Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:34 PM
- I am submitting a new RCR for this old RCR. Documentation of
prior RCRs below.
-
|